First "“ Am I happy with it? YES. If you mainly want ACCEPTABLE SCANS of your memories, it's QUICK and EASY. Perfectionists or serious photographers who sell photos should buy something more professional or use commercial scanning services; still, it's good for quick scanning of many less important slides.

Helpful articles: DPReview Jan 2021 "Reporting: Lab scan vs. Kodak Slide "˜n Scan" and Dec 2019 "Scanning vs photographing slides" (includes a video of Library of Congress archiving methods). I spent many hours reading articles and watching videos about digitizing.

I gave it 4 stars rather than 5 because it lacks the superior quality of far more expensive scanners and it limits exposure compensation. But overall, it's easy, speedy, and good quality.

Scanning is a tradeoff between TIME, QUALITY, and PRICE; top quality demands a lot more money and time. Pro film photographers often grimace and groan when asked if they've digitized all their old negatives and slides! Best methods: a dedicated film scanner (Epson, Nikon, etc. at $400 to $1000+), a flatbed scanner (min 2000dpi) with a transparency media adapter or homemade "Backlighter," a DSLR with a macro lens setup ($300+), extension tubes ($40+), or an old slide duplicator/reverser ($40 on e-bay, but requires a full-frame camera), and other creative setups found on the internet.

I scanned over 6000 slides from the 1970s to 80s. My Kodak Ektachrome and Kodakchrome slides retained more original colors than my Fujichrome. Commercial scanning companies charge about $0.20 to 0.70 per slide and more depending on quantity (e.g. $140 for 200 slides, $1000 for 5000 slides); custom scans cost even more. So it cost me $240 / 6000 slides = $0.04 per slide. It's more economical IF you have thousands of slides. An average roll (36 exposures) took me less than 10 minutes to scan (longer if I had many adjustments), so about 5 rolls per hour including saving photos to my hard drive. Compare that to one pro that used a high-end scanner who spent four 8-hour days to scan 1800 slides (about 1 minute per slide).

I haven't scanned negatives"¦for most photo memories, I simply place nine 4x6 prints together and use a DSLR to photograph them at max megapixel; I save only irreplaceable negatives.

TIPS:

Years ago, I bought a Wolverine F2D 20-Super, but it sat in a box until recently. Its 1-inch monitor is useless, so I hooked it up to my TV "“ after a month its connection mysteriously failed. Besides, adjusting exposures and colors was time consuming "“ make a small change, press OK, and then it displayed the changes. So I bought the Kodak "“ you can adjust exposures and colors in REAL TIME "“ you see your changes immediately before saving (A MAJOR PLUS, no matter what scanner you buy "“ expect MANY exposure adjustments).

I chose the 7-inch over the 5-inch screen to facilitate editing in a pinch and to use later as a digital picture frame (approximating a 4 x 6 photo), but I always planned to connect it to a large monitor. Reviewers of the 5-inch scanner had some software issues, so I hoped the 7-inch model was upgraded.

MONITOR: The 7-inch screen is acceptable for many photos, but definitely not for fine detail adjustments. Use a large computer monitor with HDMI input (for a VGA monitor, use a female HDMI to male VGA adapter). To connect the scanner, you need a male mini-HDMI to female standard-HDMI adapter; plug the male end into the scanner, and then use a standard male to male HDMI cable to connect to your monitor. (You can eliminate the adapter by using a special male mini-HDMI to male standard-HDMI cable.) I mainly share photos with friends on my computer monitor or large screen TV (which essentially replaced my old slide projector and white screen), but calibrating colors on a computer monitor is easier than most TVs. If you're going to display photos on a large screen, then use a large screen to edit them!

COMPUTER: Connecting the scanner's USB cable to my desktop computer as a power source also allowed easy transfer of images to my hard drive. The computer (or laptop) has its own separate monitor, so I could use my photo editor immediately after image transfer (so I use 2 monitors; 1 connected to the computer, and 1 connected only to the scanner) as well as listen to music while scanning.

PRIORITIZE SLIDES TO BE TIME EFFICIENT:
1) Slides to scan and then discard.
2) Slides to scan and then send to relatives and friends who may want to professionally scan them and make enlargements.
3) Slides to professionally scan (especially where exposure and color adjustments are crucial) "“ slides that are irreplaceable and/or make money; I still keep those original slides. Or if you prefer, use one of the other homemade setups and do it yourself "“ the DSLR method seems best.

In the late 70s, I ordered "inter-negatives" of slides I sold as huge enlargements (low concert lighting required slide film processed at higher ASAs, not possible with negative film back then). A slide loupe magnifier and LED light table or panel ($15 at a home building store) sometime help when you're not exactly sure.

ALWAYS CLEAN your scanner and slides. Small specks are obvious, especially in the sky (or maybe specks were birds or dust on your camera lens). Constantly check the scanner screen for dust and use its wiper brush. Clean your slides with a wide photo brush stick (easier to use and hold in the same hand while inserting a slide) and use a separate blower for lots of dust. When you still see specks on the screen, simply remove the slide holder and clean your slide and scanner screen if necessary (or flick the slide on the left side to eject the slide on the right side so you can clean it). BE PATIENT "“ cleaning is easier than touching up later!

EASIER SCANNING: Save a junk "pusher" slide to insert on the left side of the slide holder to help line up your first slide, and also to push your last slide into the scanner. And use a nice comfortable chair if you're scanning for hours!

UNEXPECTED CROPPING: The scanner crops some of the photo; long ago, slide photography taught me to avoid filling the entire frame since enlargements often cropped the edges, but sometimes it wasn't enough. E.g. vertically, the scanner cropped off the top of an Egyptian pyramid, so I simply used a scissors to trim the bottom of the slide so the slide moved downward in the holder to make the pyramid top visible. Horizontally, you have to choose between what's more important, the left or right edge.

EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENTS AND LIMITATIONS: Remember "“ the scanner is actually a camera taking a digital photo of the slide. I had to adjust exposure on MOST slides. Aim for an exposure (often underexposed) that reveals the MOST DETAILS (look for letters in signs, lines in buildings, light poles, mountain tops, no hot spots in facial features, etc.).

It's like adjusting EV on a digital camera, but the scanner only takes an AVERAGE exposure of the entire frame, not a SPOT exposure of a specific area. Photos with great differences between light and dark areas can be frustrating.

Examples:
"“ Eiffel Tower dark intricate steel framework from below against a bright sky
"“ Friends on a beach with the sun behind them where you wished you used a flash to illuminate their faces
"“ Bright sky photos with a dark airplane (like a Navy Blue Angel)
"“ Night photos (concerts, performers, fireworks) where most of the background is black; the scanner may overexpose the main subject. In existing light photography, you turn off your exposure meter and manually set your speed and aperture to avoid overexposures.

Sometimes even Kodak's +/-2 EV isn't enough; I suggest +/-4 EV for future models. To fool the scanner exposure meter to go beyond +/-2 EV, sometimes I slid the slide slightly in the holder to areas of the photo I planned to crop, or I made a little physical dark paper mask and stuck it (with a glue stick) on the bottom of the slide to block part of the scanner light source to decrease average exposures.

If the photo is very important, make a few scans (like bracketing exposures) to work on later with your photo editor. Treat it like a multiple-exposure HDR Capture (High Dynamic Range); some software can combine all the exposures into one photo, OR send that slide to the commercial scanning services!

When it doubt, ask yourself, "Is this slide worth $1 to pay a lab to custom scan? OR should I take multiple exposures and use HDR software to combine the images myself. OR should I spend a lot of time and money using expensive scanning or camera equipment?"

KNOW YOUR PHOTO EDITOR: At first, after scanning a roll, I saved it to my computer (already connected to the scanner's USB cable). Then I used photo editing software to crop and Auto Enhance for colors, brightness and contrast, bringing many colors from 40 years ago back to life. By knowing the capabilities of your photo editor, it's easier to choose better adjustments beforehand with the Kodak scanner.

I seldom adjusted Kodak's RGB unless colors were washed-out; do it before using your photo editor. (Remember, you're actually adjusting the scanner's camera to photograph your slide; it's always better to start with a good photo before using any photo editor. Old, washed-out slides need a good photo editor to revive the original colors even with the best scanner on the market.)

My Kodak scanner and photo editing software work together as a team so I get a better feel on exposures; sometimes underexposure on the Kodak gave better results when my photo editor executed Auto Enhance. Once I understood what my photo editor could do, I then scanned all my slides, leaving photo editing for later.

TO MAKE IT EASIER AND FASTER when you need to adjust thousands of slides, use one of the new economical photo editors with Artificial Intelligence (AI) to do most of your work, such as Luminar, Movavi, Photoshop CC, etc. Expect a fair amount of post editing, so make it easy. Even pros are praising the new AI photo editors "“ hours of complicated editing can now be done in less than a minute!

SOME PHOTOS JUST WON'T SCAN PROPERLY: Either send them to a custom service or forget them "“ if you haven't looked at them for 30 years, they're not that important! (Remember when your uncle would invite everyone over to watch a 2-hour slide show of his vacation?)

Treat it like "photo triage" "“ do you really want to spend the money and time on an expensive scanner? Save the handful of complex scans for the pros and pay them for their expensive machines. Trying to scan every single slide to perfection quickly turns tedious.

I still have around 2000 slides of night concerts to scan where exposure is very tricky. I'll use the Kodak scanner to save the less important slides, but make a DSLR setup for the prime slides that require a lot of time to digitize. I'll shoot RAW with the camera tethered to my computer monitor and photo editor. For the absolute best, I'll use a custom lab. Afterwards, I'll hermetically seal and store them.

ORGANIZING: I organize each roll into a file directory; some photo editors do this. If you can't remember dates of your slides, see if the processing lab stamped the slides with a month and lot order number (generally, if you sent several rolls to process at the same time, they all had the same lot number). Label your directories with that info, and after scanning all your slides, look at the photos to sort the directories chronologically.

CONCLUSION: Use the Kodak scanner to scan most photos to make it cost and time efficient, and for the most precious photos, use a superior setup (film scanner or DSLR, but requires more time) or a commercial lab. The Kodak scanner saved me a lot of time and money!

HAVE FUN! Seeing memories from 40 years ago and remembering family and old friends is terrific for your spirits!

The device is pretty easy to use. I used it to put 35 mm slides on my computer. When you go into "film type", it gives you options of 50mm slide, color or B&W negative. If you choose the "slide", a tip for 35mm slides is to choose the "126mm film". (You have a choice of 135,126 or 110mm); this reduces the size of the saved file by about 20% by not including the unexposed area around the slide. (You can also reduce the size of the file by reducing the saved size as 14 M rather than 22M unless you really need that extra detail).

The editing capabilities are minimal- brightness or red/green/blue. But you can use a computer editor to do more.

Scanning the slide is simple - Align the slide in the viewer and push one button; you'll see an hourglass appear. It only takes 1-2 seconds to scan. Image quality is good.

My beef with this device is there is no way to scan directly to your computer. The scan you create goes to an SD card (not included) you place in the scanner. You then have to upload the images from the card to your computer (which is easy enough through the "USB upload" link). I was scanning individual boxes of slides so, to keep them separate, I had to scan to the card, upload from the card to my computer, then clear the card so I wouldn't mix different batches of slides. I found this unnecessarily cumbersome. There is also no way to direct your uploaded scans to a specific folder on your computer. It uploads to an all purpose "picture" folder and then you can distribute it as you like. To greatly improve this scanner, you should be able to download directly to your computer and, preferably to a specific folder. It shouldn't be that difficult to create an interface that does this. That said, it's easy to use and the quality of the images is good.

I thought the image scanned would take up the entire 7" screen. It doesn't - only about 1/4th (at last for 35 mm slides) so don't go with the cheaper 5" screen. It's hard to make out any but the grossest detail.

Great for quick acquisitions, conversions of analogue to digital. Decent resolution and latitude options. I highly recommend this as a tool to capture many slides quickly. To use to pick your selects for scanning via other solutions later on.

I love this scanner. It does a great job with my hundreds of old slides. Having a pretty good image uploaded to my computer as well as the SD card so easily was so easy. My only complaint was that the large screen on the front made it inconvenient to load the slides. It was just a it awkward. I should have chosen the 5 inch one instead.

I've wanted to stay up with technology an digitize my roughly 1,500 slides from decades ago. This scanner worked well to do that. I had a scanner years ago that took about one minute per slide; this one brings the time down to a few seconds. Another incentive was that a recently deceased friend had a few thousand slides that I wanted to save in compact form.
I generally scanned at the lower resolution and did only 35 mm slides so I can't report on other film sizes and resolutions. I processed about 100 slides at a time because it seemed easier to keep track of that many images. I kept one image on the SD card and changed the sequence number to make it easier to work with groups of slides.
One issue I encountered was keeping the diffuser clean. The case doesn't seem to be easy to open; so far I'm using canned air in addition to the supplied wand to remove specks on the light source.
I'm grateful that the storage space for images went from dozens of slide carousels to a single flash drive (with backup copies).